|
Post by iberion on Oct 14, 2015 21:05:40 GMT
yes, sounds really nice
|
|
|
Post by R3peat on Oct 15, 2015 16:07:14 GMT
will do my best the next days when i have some free time
|
|
|
Post by R3peat on Oct 16, 2015 15:50:37 GMT
ok refactored it. when setting a value to -1 it will spend all available points in there till it reached the cap of that stat in core tab when setting mainstat or vit to -1 it will spend points to those stats at the end so after movementspeed and max resource are set for movementspeed when setting it to -1 it will check ur current MS and spent points needed to reach 25%ms if current ms < 25%
|
|
|
Post by R3peat on Oct 16, 2015 16:01:06 GMT
is good or want more ?
i will not expand the 4 different setups for now and i will not make them hero bound
4 Setups should be enough i think
|
|
|
Post by iberion on Oct 16, 2015 20:32:26 GMT
it's necessary to define an order in which the points are spend. otherwise it's everytime from top to bottom if I use -1.
|
|
|
Post by R3peat on Oct 16, 2015 20:36:50 GMT
in coretab the priorities are hardcoded. in the other tabs its from top to bottom currently yes
|
|
|
Post by iberion on Oct 16, 2015 20:50:44 GMT
there must be a possibility to specify for example that all resist is used first, then armor, life and lps. for int classes it looks different.
|
|
|
Post by R3peat on Oct 16, 2015 20:55:00 GMT
xD fml. think i will remove the -1 possibilities for the other tabs and just let it in the core tab xD
|
|
|
Post by iberion on Oct 16, 2015 21:03:15 GMT
that doesn't sound good. isn't it possible to reorder table rows? maybe the data representation with tables isn't the best solution. or you define another column with numbers 1 - 4 which represents the order the user wants.
|
|
|
Post by iberion on Oct 16, 2015 21:07:48 GMT
and if you make build definitions character bound why not paragon system? the order is depending on the build used.
|
|
|
Post by R3peat on Oct 16, 2015 21:16:13 GMT
<_< to make it work like it is now i just spent some time and refactored a bit but with your idea i have to refactor the whole fucking thing
i will implement an order which u can customize but i will not make it bound to hero. i need some more posts of people who are interested in this before doing this
|
|
|
Post by R3peat on Oct 16, 2015 21:28:35 GMT
i will rethink this tomorrow but now i have to sleep
|
|
|
Post by R3peat on Oct 17, 2015 7:21:47 GMT
ok i will refactor dat thing completly
with changeable orders and storage per HeroId
and i will move it to a seperate Tab in Settings
but it will be caped @ 4 Setups per Hero
|
|
|
Post by iberion on Oct 17, 2015 7:24:33 GMT
Nice i think it would be nice to bind the setups to the builds, because there is only one setup per build necessary. What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by R3peat on Oct 17, 2015 7:32:19 GMT
letting the user define up to 4 different Setups per Hero and pressing the assigned Hotkey to pump in the Points should be fair and easy enough i think
|
|